P2834Diagnostic yield of holter recording after atrial fibrillation ablation - detection of asymptomatic recurrences during a one-year follow-up period

Abstract Background Strategies to detect recurrences after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation vary widely. Whereas a symptom-based approach may overestimate procedural success due to asymptomatic recurrences, continuous invasive monitoring with implantable devices may be refused by patients and is not routinely recommended. In trial settings, Holter monitoring is recommended at one year after ablation, though more frequent and intensive follow-up is encouraged for more accurate detection of arrhythmia recurrences. Purpose To study the diagnostic yield of Holter monitoring in the detection of asymptomatic recurrent arrhythmias after cryoballoon catheter ablation for AF. Methods Prospective registry on AF patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation with subsequent follow-up in our centre. Follow-up comprised routine (i.e. at 3, 6, and 12 months) and symptom-driven electrocardiographic (ECG) registrations after a three-month blanking period. In addition, patients were scheduled for six-day Holter monitoring shortly after the blanking period, at six months and at the end of the one-year follow-up period. For the current analysis, we studied the Holter recordings of the patients without previously detected arrhythmia recurrence and determined the proportion of asymptomatic recurrences at each respective monitoring period. Results We studied 364 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR 54–66) and a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 (IQR 1–2). One-year recurrences were documented in 119 (32.7%) patients, of which 90 were initially detected on Holter recording and 39 on ECG registrations (Table). A total of 34 patients did not report symptoms during the documentation of recurrent arrhythmia and comprised 28.6% (34/119) of all recurrences and 37.8% (34/90) of the Holter-detected recurrences. At the three-month Holter registration, 33.3% of the patients with recurrences did not report symptoms, which was 29.4% and 62.5% at the six- and twelve-month registrations, respectively (Figure). Timing and detection of recurrences Time after ablation 3 months 3–6 months 6 months 6–12 months 12 months Patients with Holter-detected recurrences 57/119 (47.9%) 17/119 (14.3%) 16/119 (13.4%) Patients with ECG-documented recurrences 18/119 (15.1%) 11/119 (9.2%) Proportions of asymptomatic recurrences Conclusions In this cohort of AF patients with serial six-day Holter monitoring after cryoballoon ablation, up to one-third of the patients had asymptomatic recurrences. Whereas Holter monitoring shortly after the blanking period detected nearly half of all one-year recurrences, the proportion of asymptomatic detected recurrences was higher in recordings at one year and seems therefore important in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences after catheter ablation.