P10.03 Immunological differences between patient-matched normal-derived and GBM-derived pericytes

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive, fatal, yet most common form of brain malignancy in adults. Despite advances in immune-based treatments for other modes of cancer, GBM remains a challenge due to its ability to dampen immune responses via mechanisms not yet fully understood. With a median survival time of only 15 months following diagnosis, there is a strong push to find new targets for therapy. The microenvironment comprises a mixture of malignant tumour cells, stroma, blood vessels and infiltrating inflammatory cells. Despite advances in understanding the contribution of these cells in establishing an anti-inflammatory microenvironment, the contribution of pericytes, an important neurovascular mural cell that forms the blood-brain barrier, has been inadequately studied. Therefore, we investigated the differences in immune profile between patient-matched non-neoplastic brain- and GBM-derived pericytes under basal and induced conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Primary patient-matched non-neoplastic brain and GBM tumour derived pericytes were isolated from specimens excised from consenting patients undergoing GBM surgical resection at Auckland City Hospital. Pericytes were treated with inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNFα and TGFβ for up to 24 hours. Inflammatory profile changes were probed for using fluorescent immunocytochemistry, qRT-PCR and spectral flow cytometry. Media was also collected for secretome analysis via cytometric bead array. RESULTS GBM pericytes show decreased expression of CX3CL1, both basally and following IL-1β treatment, via qRT-PCR and CBA. In contrast, increased gene expression and secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by GBM pericytes were observed. GBM pericytes also basally express CD90 and anti-inflammatory molecule PD-L1 compared to their normal counterparts. In terms of activated pathways, basal SMAD2/3 activation is increased in GBM pericytes, while also showing greater activation following treatment with IL-1β, IFN-γ but not TNFα. C/EBPδ is activated and translocated following inflammatory stimulation; however, shows localised expression within the cytoplasm only observed in GBM pericytes. CONCLUSION This immunological screen of GBM pericytes highlights them as key players in the establishment of the tumour microenvironment. With data suggesting the activation of pathways such as the SMAD2/3 pathway in an unconventional manner, it suggests the potential for pericytes to manipulate pathways towards a more immunosuppressive outcome. Further immune characterisation of such cells is required to fully understand how they might contribute to the immunosuppressive nature of GBM.