An Empirical Assessment Of The Influence Of March And Simon'S Organizations: The Realized Contribution And Unfulfilled Promise Of A Masterpiece

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES(2019)

引用 21|浏览8
暂无评分
摘要
March and Simon's Organizations is a seminal work in management studies. We assess the contribution Organizations has made to management studies through a citation context analysis of 1,400 articles from top management journals. By categorizing the content from Organizations cited in subsequent works, we find that two related categories associated with cognitive limits and routines or programs account for half (50.5%) of all citation contexts since 1990. We also investigate whether citations to Organizations have been peripheral or substantial to the citing authors' claims, how cited content has changed over time, and the extent to which citing works have provided empirical evidence to test March and Simon's propositions or have been critical of their assertions. Our investigation reveals disturbingly few attempts to empirically validate the assertions made in Organizations. Overall, we provide a critical reflection on how well subsequent scholarship fulfils the aims and promise heralded by this masterpiece.
更多
查看译文
关键词
bounded rationality, citation context analysis, empirical testing, organization theory, routines
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要