Lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: comparison of MDCT and MR imaging for diagnostic accuracy

Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracies of MDCT and high-resolution MRI (HR-MRI) for regional nodal metastases with different short-axis diameter ranges in rectal cancer patients. Methods Rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent both MDCT and HR-MRI before surgery were included. The maximum short-axis diameters of the nodes were measured, and were classified as benign or malignant on imaging findings. All of the nodes were subdivided as follows: ≤ 5 mm (Group A), > 5 mm and ≤ 10 mm (Group B) , and > 10 mm (Group C). The postoperative pathological reports were used as the standard, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC value were calculated for each subgroup. Results A total of 592 nodes were included in the node-to-node evaluation. In Group A, the specificity and accuracy of HR-MRI were significantly higher than those of MDCT (99.28% vs. 93.99%, P < 0.001; 95.78% vs. 89.56%, P = 0.010; respectively). In Group B, the specificity and accuracy of HR-MRI were also higher than those of MDCT (98.36% vs. 55.74%, P < 0.001; 80.45% vs. 66.17%, P < 0.001; respectively). For Groups A and B, the AUCs of MDCT were both 0.65, whereas those of HR-MRI were 0.76 and 0.82, respectively. In Group C, all nine malignant nodes were correctly diagnosed metastases on MDCT, whereas one was misjudged as benign on HR-MRI. Conclusions The diagnostic value of HR-MRI is superior to that of MDCT, with higher specificity, accuracy, and AUC values for HR-MRI than for MDCT.