Feasibility of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation of lung cancer by a trained pulmonologist during bronchoscopy examination.

Objective Rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) in bronchoscopy is a useful ancillary technique. ROSE is usually performed by a cytopathologist or cytotechnologist. However, because of staff shortages and reduced availability, ROSE cannot be performed in every hospital. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ROSE when performed by a trained pulmonologist, comparing the diagnosis results with the final diagnosis of cytopathologists. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study on 125 patients who underwent bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) for peripheral pulmonary lesions by conventional bronchoscopy at Sapporo Medical University Hospital between March 2012 and September 2018. ROSE was performed by a pulmonologist who was trained by a cytotechnologist for a total of 1 month. DiffQuik (R) staining for ROSE was used to prepare cytology slides. The results of ROSE were compared with the final diagnosis obtained using Papanicolaou staining by cytopathologists. Results In all procedures, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ROSE were 88.5%, 83.0% and 86.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value or accuracy between EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-GS. Conclusions ROSE of lung cancer by a trained pulmonologist can be highly accurate and deemed as feasible and useful for not only EBUS-TBNA but also EBUS-GS.