Characterization of subjects experiencing selective hypersensitivity reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology(2019)

引用 0|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
Selective hypersensitivity reactions (SHR) are the second most frequent NSAID-induced hypersensitivity. Our aim was to characterize a group of patients with SHR to NSAIDs, analyzing symptoms, culprit drugs and diagnostic methods. We verified acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-tolerance and classified patients as single NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema/anaphylaxis (SNIUAA) or single-NSAID-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions (SNIDHR) whether the symptoms appeared less or more than 24 hours after NSAIDs administration. In metamizole-induced- SNIUAA, we performed skin tests (STs), and if negative basophil activation test (BAT) was performed. When these tests were or other drugs were involved with <2 episodes reported, drug provocation test (DPT) with the culprit was performed. We included 518 patients with a mean age of 43 (31.25-54) years, 459 SNIUAA and 59 SNIDHR, and 66.2% were female. In SNIUAA, anaphylaxis (32.4%) was the most frequent entity, and in SNIDHR was maculopapular exanthema (44.1%). Metamizole was the most frequent culprit in SNIUAA (39.7%, p=0.003) and propionic acids in SNIDHR (46.8%, p>0.05). In 11.2% patients, DPT with the culprit was performed. In 60.4% patients, diagnosis was established by a history of repeated episodes (76.3% SNIDHR vs 63.6% SNIUAA, p>0.05). STs with metamizole was positive for 72% SNIUAA and for 57.1% SNIDHR (p>0.05). BAT was positive in 25.8% metamizole-induced SNIUAA patients with negative STs. SNIUAA to metamizole is the most frequent type of NSAID-induced SHR. Although STs and BAT may aid in the diagnosis of these reactions, their sensitivity is low. Further research is needed to develop better diagnostic tools.
更多
查看译文
关键词
selective hypersensitivity reactions,nsaids,non-steroidal,anti-inflammatory
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要