Optical metric assessed engineered tissues over a range of viability states.

Many conventional methods to assess engineered tissue morphology and viability are destructive techniques with limited utility for tissue constructs intended for implantation in patients. Sterile label-free optical molecular imaging methods analyzed tissue endogenous fluorophores without staining, noninvasively and quantitatively assessing engineered tissue, in lieu of destructive assessment methods. The objective of this study is to further investigate label-free optical metrics and their correlation with destructive methods. Tissue-engineered constructs (n = 33 constructs) fabricated with primary human oral keratinocytes (n = 10 patients) under control, thermal stress, and rapamycin treatment manufacturing conditions exhibited a range of tissue viability states, as evaluated by quantitative histology scoring, WST-1 assay, Ki-67 immunostaining imaging, and label-free optical molecular imaging methods. Both histology sections of fixed tissues and cross-sectioned label-free optical images of living tissues provided quantitative spatially selective information on local tissue morphology, but optical methods noninvasively characterized both local tissue morphology and cellular viability at the same living tissue site. Furthermore, optical metrics noninvasively assessed living tissue viability with a statistical significance consistent with the destructive tissue assays WST-1 and histology. Over the range of cell viability states created experimentally, optical metrics noninvasively and quantitatively characterized living tissue viability and correlated with the destructive WST-1 tissue assay. By providing, under sterile conditions, noninvasive metrics that were comparable with conventional destructive tissue assays, label-free optical molecular imaging has the potential to monitor and assess engineered tissue construct viability before surgical implantation.