Appendicovesicostomy versus monti ileovesicostomy for Mitrofanoff channel - The Indiana experience in over 300 patients

You have accessJournal of UrologyDiscussed Poster: Monday, May 22, 2006, 1:00 - 4:00 pm1 Apr 2006772: Appendicovesicostomy versus Monti Ileovesicostomy for Mitrofanoff Channel- the Indiana Experience in Over 300 Patients Andrew M. Dussinger, Mark P. Cain, Anthony J. Casale, Martin Kaefer, Kirsten Meldrum, and Richard C. Rink Andrew M. DussingerAndrew M. Dussinger More articles by this author , Mark P. CainMark P. Cain More articles by this author , Anthony J. CasaleAnthony J. Casale More articles by this author , Martin KaeferMartin Kaefer More articles by this author , Kirsten MeldrumKirsten Meldrum More articles by this author , and Richard C. RinkRichard C. Rink More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(18)33008-8AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "772: Appendicovesicostomy versus Monti Ileovesicostomy for Mitrofanoff Channel- the Indiana Experience in Over 300 Patients." The Journal of Urology, 175(4S), pp. 250–251 © 2016 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 175Issue 4SApril 2006Page: 250-251 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Andrew M. Dussinger More articles by this author Mark P. Cain More articles by this author Anthony J. Casale More articles by this author Martin Kaefer More articles by this author Kirsten Meldrum More articles by this author Richard C. Rink More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...