Reply To Bistline And Blanford: Letter Reaffirms Conclusions And Highlights Flaws In Previous Research

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(2016)

引用 5|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Bistline and Blanford’s (1) (hereinafter BB16) comments about Jacobson et al. (2) (hereinafter J15) are incorrect or unsubstantiated, and thus affect no conclusion in J15. However, their remarks highlight the failure of previous decarbonization studies to treat many existing storage options, load reduction upon electrification, accurate wind power, and true nuclear and carbon capture costs.[↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: jacobson{at}stanford.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要