The structure of PTSD in active-duty marines across the deployment cycle

Objective: There has been significant debate about the optimal factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In military and veteran samples, most available studies have employed self-report measures, assessed PTSD cross-sectionally, used treatment-seeking samples, and assessed symptoms years after deployment. We extend previous studies by comparing the factor structure of clinician-assessed and self-report Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) PTSD in a nontreatment seeking sample at 4 time points spanning the deployment cycle. Method: The data source for this study was the Marine Resiliency Study (MRS), a longitudinal study of 4 battalion cohorts of active-duty male Marines deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan between 2008 and 2012. We examined the fourth cohort (N = 892), which was evaluated 1 month predeployment, and 1, 5, and 8 months postdeployment. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) revealed that the 5-factor solution best fit the data across all time points, and across both interview and self-report assessments. Conclusion: The temporal consistency and convergence demonstrated by our analyses underscores the validity of the 5-factor model among service members exposed to warzone stressors. In particular, the findings suggest that diagnostic criteria for PTSD may benefit from disaggregating hyperarousal symptoms in military samples.