Closed Commitment Proceedings Versus Open Administration of Justice

Aaron A. Duke,Madelon Baranoski

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law(2014)

引用 23|浏览46
暂无评分
摘要
In In re Detention of D.F.F ., 256 P.3d 357 (Wash. 2011), the Washington Supreme Court held that requiring automatic closure of psychiatric commitment hearings violates Article I, § 10 of the Washington State Constitution, which states that “[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要