MP20-10 STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR ROBOTIC SURGERY UTILIZING A GENERIC PROFICIENCY SCORE

age was 25.5 and 53.8% were females. The average “Tubes” score for the dV-Trainer and dVSSS were 10/100 and 48.5/100 respectively. Scores of MS and JR were similar (p1⁄40.36). GEARS scores of participants who initially used the dVSSS compared to the dV-Trainer were significantly higher (21/25 vs. 17.2/25, p1⁄40.04). Similarly, RACE scores of participants who used the dVSSS were also significantly higher compared to the dV-Trainer (23.2/25 vs. 17.8/25, p1⁄40.02). Scores of MS and JR were similar for GEARS (p1⁄40.50) and RACE score (p1⁄40.57). Intraclass correlation coefficient for the GEARS and RACE scoring were 72.6 and 89.3 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dVSSS trainer lead to superior scores in performing UVA in the OR for both MS and JR compared to the dVTrainer. The dVSSS can be used to improve teaching in surgical trainees in a safe and effective manner.