Tailoring Educational and Behavioral Interventions to Level of Health Literacy: A Systematic Review.

The relative value of universal compared to contingent approaches to communication and behavioral interventions for persons of low health literacy remains unknown. To examine the effectiveness of interventions that are tailored to individual health literacy level compared to nontailored interventions on health-related outcomes. Systematic review. PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were eligible if they were in English, used an experimental or observational design, included an intervention that was tailored based on the individual's level of education, health literacy or health numeracy, and had a comparator group in which the intervention was not tailored to individual characteristics. Databases were searched from inception to January 2016, and the retrieved reference lists hand searched. Abstracts that met PICOS criteria underwent dual review for data extraction to assess study details and study quality. A qualitative synthesis was conducted. Of 2,323 unique citations, 458 underwent full review, and 9 met criteria for the systematic review. Five studies were positive and rated as good quality, 3 were negative with 2 of those of good quality, and 1 had mixed results (fair quality). Positive studies were conducted in the clinical domains of hypertension, diabetes, and depression with interventions including educational materials, disease management sessions, literacy training, and physician notification of limited health literacy among patients. Negative studies were conducted in the clinical domains of heart disease, glaucoma, and nutrition with interventions including medication reconciliation and educational materials. Tailoring communication and behavioral interventions to the individual level of health literacy may be an effective strategy to improve knowledge and indicators of disease control in selected clinical settings.