Anatomically and functionally relevant coronary stenoses in patients with normal single-photon emission computed tomography but persistent stable angina.

Aims Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is widely used for the assessment of coronary artery disease and for decision making regarding revascularization. Concerns about possible false negative findings exist. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of stenoses which are both functionally and anatomically significant in patients referred for invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements following a normal SPECT, because of persistent complaints. Methods and results One hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with normal SPECT were included, with a total of 180 FFR measurements. Luminal narrowing of >= 70% (>= 50% for left main) together with a FFR <= 0.80 denoted an anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Separate analyses were performed for FFR <0.75. Mean age of the patients was 65, 40% were women. Sixteen percent of the study population had both anatomically and functionally significant stenoses. Besides the use of nitrate, no differences in baseline characteristics, symptoms, coronary history, or pre-test likelihood could be identified for the prediction of functionally relevant obstructive coronary disease. If FFR <0.75 was used, only 7.5% of the patients had both anatomically and functionally significant stenoses. Conclusion In patients with normal SPECT who undergo FFR measurements because of persistent complaints, the prevalence of stenoses which are both anatomically and functionally significant is low. This suggests that the prevalence of false-negative SPECT is (very) low.