Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to examine whether cochlear implantation using the round window (RW) route versus cochleostomy achieves comparable electrode impedance and hearing results. METHODS:This retrospective analysis included 40 patients receiving a cochlear implant (REZ-1): 20 using the RW approach and the remaining 20 using cochleostomy. Electrode impedance and tone, vowel, consonant, disyllable and sentence perception were measured during and after the implantation. RESULTS:Electrode impedance did not differ significantly between the 2 groups at any time points [F(1, 38) = 1.84; p = 0.184]: 1.87, 5.16, 6.47 and 6.70 kΩ in the RW group versus 2.86, 5.33, 6.92 and 8.16 kΩ in the cochleostomy group at 0, 1, 3 and 12 months, respectively. There was no significant difference between the RW and cochleostomy groups for tone (77.50 vs. 80.50%; p = 0.472), vowel (77.70 vs. 78.65%; p = 0.760), consonant (75.50 vs. 78.25%; p = 0.443), disyllable (78.60 vs. 81.50%; p = 0.317) and sentence (50.90 vs. 52.50%; p = 0.684) perception at 12 months. CONCLUSION:The RW approach is comparable to cochleostomy in electrode placement as reflected by impedance and function as reflected by tone, vowel, consonant, disyllable and sentence perception.