Reply To Jung Et Al.: Default Neglect Persists Over Time And Across Contexts
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(2018)
摘要
We appreciate the comments and studies by Jung et al. (1). They test for default neglect in three new default games, finding that “Choice Architects” (CAs) are better than chance at correctly predicting the default effect in these new contexts.That said, we believe that Jung et al.’s claim that CAs are “excellent” at setting defaults (1) is premature. First, they do not present data on default-setting behavior, per se, but rather on beliefs about the default effect. This distinction is important because default-setting behavior does not always correlate with beliefs about the default effect (study 3 in ref. 2). Second, default neglect should be conceptualized as a spectrum from total … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: jjzlatev{at}stanford.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络