Impact of Frailty on Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Background. Although frailty is used to predict morbidity and mortality, its effect on the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection has not been examined. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the role of frailty in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was undertaken for all patients (n = 310) undergoing aortic surgery between May 2004 and March 2017. Frailty was evaluated using an index consisting of age more than 70 years, body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m(2), serum creatinine greater than 1.2 mg/dL, anemia, history of stroke, hypoalbuminemia, and the psoas muscle area index. One point was given for each criterion met, for a frailty score between 0 and 7. Frailty was defined as a score of 3 or more. Results. Of all patients, 106 (34.2%) were defined as frail. Inhospital mortality rates of frail versus nonfrail patients were not significantly different (10.4% versus 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.54). Incidences of postoperative major morbidities without reexploration for bleeding were also not statistically different. Five-year survival rates were significantly worse for frail patients than for nonfrail patients (57.7% versus 85.1%, respectively; p = 0.0001). A frailty score of 3 or greater was associated with late mortality, and long-term outcomes were clearly stratified by frailty score. Conclusions. Frailty, as defined using a seven-component frailty index, can serve as an independent predictor of the risk of late mortality for patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Such frailty markers, all of which are easily assessed preoperatively, may provide valuable information for patient counseling and risk stratification before aortic surgery. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons