Comparison of outcomes with surgical cut-down versus percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: TAVR transfemoral access comparisons between surgical cut-down and percutaneous approach.

Brandon C Drafts,Charles H Choi, Kunal Sangal, Michael W Cammarata,Robert J Applegate,Sanjay K Gandhi,Edward H Kincaid,Neal Kon,David X Zhao

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS(2018)

引用 25|浏览18
暂无评分
摘要
ObjectivesThe objective is to compare the short-term (30 days) and late (12 months) vascular adverse events in patients undergoing transfemoral (TF)-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by surgical cut-down (SC) vs. percutaneous (PC) approaches. BackgroundPrograms continue to utilize both approaches in TF-TAVR. There are limited data comparing outcomes by SC vs. PC approaches and long-term effects of endovascular intervention facilitated hemostasis on late vascular adverse events. MethodsA total of 146 men and women aged 79.710.0 years with severe aortic stenosis deemed extreme or high risk for surgery underwent TAVR via TF access. 61 had SC and 85 had PC approaches. Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) outcomes were assessed at an average of 12.1 months after TAVR. ResultsHospital length of stay (LOS) post-TAVR was shorter for the PC group compared to the SC group (5.1 +/- 3.9 vs. 8.2 +/- 6.6 days; P<0.001). More patients were discharged directly to home in the PC than the SC group (85.9% vs. 68.9%, P<0.05). At 30 days, there were 13/61 (21.3%) and 16/85 (18.8%; P<0.05) of any vascular events, and 2/61 (3.3%) and 2/85 (2.4%; P=0.73) major vascular events in the SC and PC groups, respectively. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the SC (14/61; 23%) and PC groups [17/85 (20%); P=0.34]. There was no difference in any [4/33 (12%) vs. 3/43 (7%); P=0.84] or major vascular adverse events [1/33 (3%) vs. 1/43 (2%); P=0.79] in subjects that underwent adjunctive endovascular intervention compared to those who did not, respectively. There were no statistically significant univariate or multivariate predictors of any vascular event at 12 months when comparing SC to PC groups. ConclusionFor TF TAVR, the PC approach, when compared to the SC approach, is associated with a shorter hospital LOS and higher rate of direct discharge to home with similar risk of vascular complications, late vascular adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 12 months.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Transcatheter valve implantation,vascular complications,aortic valve disease percutaneous intervention,comparative effectiveness,patient centered outcomes research
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要