Influence of interface and position on upper airway collapsibility assessed by negative expiratory pressure

Purpose Negative expiratory pressure (NEP) is a simple technique for the evaluation of upper airway collapsibility in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Most studies evaluated NEP using a mouthpiece that may exclude the cephalic portion of the upper airway. We hypothesize that NEP determination is influenced by interface and position. Methods We evaluated patients with suspected OSA using polysomnography, NEP (−5 cmH 2 O in sitting and supine position with mouthpiece and nasal mask). A subgroup also underwent computed tomography (CT) of the upper airway. Results We studied a total of 86 subjects (72 male, age 46 ± 12 yrs, body mass index 30.0 ± 4.4 kg/m 2 , neck circumference 40.0 ± 3.5 cm, AHI 32.9 ± 26.4, range 0.5 to 122.5 events/hour). NEP was influenced by interface and position ( p = 0.007), and upper airway was more collapsible with mouthpiece than with nasal mask in sitting position ( p = 0.001). Position influenced NEP and was worse in supine only when evaluated by nasal mask. Expiratory resistance ( R 0.2 ) at 0.2 s during NEP was significantly higher and independent of position with mouthpiece than with nasal mask (20.7 versus 8.6 cmH 2 O/L s −1 , respectively, p = 0.018). NEP evaluated with nasal mask in supine position and with mouthpiece in sitting position, but not when evaluated with mouthpiece in supine position, were correlated with upper airway anatomical measurements including tongue dimensions and pharyngeal length. Conclusions Interface and position influence NEP. NEP evaluated with nasal mask in supine position may convey more relevant information for patients under investigation for OSA than when evaluated with mouthpiece.