Evaluation of cognitive load and emotional states during multidisciplinary critical care simulation sessions.

Background The simulation in critical care setting involves a heterogeneous group of participants with varied background and experience. Measuring the impacts of simulation on emotional state and cognitive load in this setting is not often performed. The feasibility of such measurement in the critical care setting needs further exploration. Methods Medical and nursing staff with varying levels of experience from a tertiary intensive care unit participated in a standardised clinical simulation scenario. The emotional state of each participant was assessed before and after completion of the scenario using a validated eight-item scale containing bipolar oppositional descriptors of emotion. The cognitive load of each participant was assessed after the completion of the scenario using a validated subjective rating tool. Results A total of 103 medical and nursing staff participated in the study. The participants felt more relaxed (-0.281.15 vs 0.14 +/- 1, P<0.005; d=0.39), excited (0.25 +/- 0.89 vs 0.55 +/- 0.92, P<0.005, d=0.35) and alert (0.85 +/- 0.87 vs 1.28 +/- 0.73, P<0.00001, d=0.54) following simulation. There was no difference in the mean scores for the remaining five items. The mean cognitive load for all participants was 6.67 +/- 1.41. There was no significant difference in the cognitive loads among medical staff versus nursing staff (6.61 +/- 2.3 vs 6.62 +/- 1.7; P>0.05). Conclusion A well-designed complex high fidelity critical care simulation scenario can be evaluated to identify the relative cognitive load of the participants' experience and their emotional state. The movement of learners emotionally from a more negative state to a positive state suggests that simulation can be an effective tool for improved knowledge transfer and offers more opportunity for dynamic thinking.