Evaluation of two commercial methods for the susceptibility testing of Candida species: Vitek 2 ® and Sensititre YeastOne ® .

Revista Iberoamericana de Micología(2018)

引用 11|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
Background: An increased incidence of fungal infections caused by Candida species, especially Candida glabrata and Candida krusei, which are less susceptible to azoles, has been observed. Standardized susceptibility testing is essential for clinical management and for monitoring the epidemiology of resistance. Aims: We evaluated the performance of two different susceptibility testing commercial methods, Vitek 2 (R) and Sensititre YeastOne (R), and compared them with the standard broth microdilution method (CLSI). Methods: A total of 80 isolates of several Candida species (Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis complex, Candida tropicalis, C. glabrata and C krusei) were selected for this study. Results: We analyzed the categorical agreement (CA) between the methods, stratifying the disagreements. The average CA between the methods was 96.3% for Vitek 2 (R) and 84% for Sensititre YeastOne (R). No very major errors were observed. Major errors and minor errors were found for all the isolates tested. With the azoles, both Vitek 2 (R) and Sensititre YeastOne (R) had good and similar performance levels, except for C tropicalis and C krusei (Sensititre YeastOne (R) showed low CA, 56.2%). With the echinocandins, both methods showed good performance for C. albicans, C parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. However, we observed important discrepancies for C krusei with caspofungin: Vitek 2 (R) had 100% CA while Sensititre YeastOne (R) had only 25%. With amphotericin B, both Vitek 2 (R) and Sensititre YeastOne (R) had good performance with high CA. Conclusions: Despite the limited isolates tested, we concluded that both methods have good performance and are reliable for antifungal susceptibility testing. However, caspofungin activity against C krusei and C glabrata should be interpreted carefully when using Sensititre VeastOne (R) because we observed a low CA. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of Asociacion Espanola de Micologia.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Candida,Antifungal susceptibility testing,Antifungals
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要