Elemental composition and microbial community differences between wastewater treatment plant effluent and local natural surface water: A Zhengzhou city study

Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent is discharged into rivers as supplemental water, which may result in ecological risk. This study compares the element composition and microbial community of WWTP effluent and natural surface water (NSW) and reveals the potential ecological risk of WWTP effluent discharge. Twenty recently upgraded WWTPs and three relatively large reservoirs in Zhengzhou city, China, were selected. The contents of N, P, S, K, Ca, Mg, B, Si, Na, Fe, Mn, Co, Ni and Sn were significantly higher in WWTP effluent than in NSW, while those of Mo, V, Pb and Cd were significantly lower. There was no significant difference between WWTP effluent and NSW in terms of the element imbalance index (IMI) (representing the extent of imbalance of element proportions) relative to the class IV surface water quality standard (the control standard for most Chinese rivers). The macronutrient IMI relative to the Hoagland formula was significantly lower in WWTP effluent than in NSW, and WWTP effluent discharge could significantly lower this index in NSW; this may be an important cause of primary productivity explosion. The microbial diversity was significantly higher in WWTP effluent than in NSW. The predicted relative abundances of mobile genetic elements and oxidative-stress-tolerant phenotypes were significantly higher in WWTP effluent than in NSW, whereas the abundance of gram-negative phenotypes was significantly lower, and that of potential pathogenic phenotypes was slightly lower. The effluent from upgraded WWTPs exhibited a low risk of pathogen diffusion but a high risk of antibiotic resistance gene diffusion. The element composition and microbial community should be considered when evaluating the ecological risk of WWTP effluent discharge.