Quality Of Life And Scar Evolution After Negative Pressure Or Conventional Therapy For Wound Dehiscence Following Post-Bariatric Abdominoplasty

No studies have examined scars and quality of life after different treatments of wound dehiscence in patients undergoing post-bariatric abdominoplasty. Scars and quality of life of patients with postoperative wound dehiscence managed with negative pressure wound therapy (group A) and conventional wound therapy (group B) were reviewed 6 months after wound healing. Of 38 patients undergoing treatment for wound dehiscence after 203 abdominoplasty, 35 (group A = 14 versus group B = 21) entered the study. Wound healing in group A was significantly faster than group B (P = 0001). Patients (P = 00001) and observers (P = 00001) reported better overall opinions on a scar assessment scale for group A. Better overall quality of life and general health satisfaction were observed in group A (P < 005). A significant correlation was observed between the World Health Organization Quality of Life scores and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores (r=-068, P < 00001) in all 35 patients. Negative pressure wound therapy is feasible and effective in patients with wound dehiscence following post-bariatric abdominoplasty. An adequate post-treatment outcome is achieved compared with conventional wound therapy in light of a strong association found between worse patient scar self-assessment and poor overall quality of life, regardless of the received treatment.