Prophet secretary through blind strategies

In the classic prophet inequality, a well-known problem in optimal stopping theory, samples from independent random variables (possibly differently distributed) arrive online. A gambler who knows the distributions, but cannot see the future, must decide at each point in time whether to stop and pick the current sample or to continue and lose that sample forever. The goal of the gambler is to maximize the expected value of what she picks and the performance measure is the worst case ratio between the expected value the gambler gets and what a prophet that sees all the realizations in advance gets. In the late seventies, Krengel and Sucheston (Bull Am Math Soc 83(4):745–747, 1977), established that this worst case ratio is 0.5. A particularly interesting variant is the so-called prophet secretary problem, in which the only difference is that the samples arrive in a uniformly random order. For this variant several algorithms are known to achieve a constant of 1-1/e ≈ 0.632 and very recently this barrier was slightly improved by Azar et al. (in: Proceedings of the ACM conference on economics and computation, EC, 2018). In this paper we introduce a new type of multi-threshold strategy, called blind strategy . Such a strategy sets a nonincreasing sequence of thresholds that depends only on the distribution of the maximum of the random variables, and the gambler stops the first time a sample surpasses the threshold of the stage. Our main result shows that these strategies can achieve a constant of 0.669 for the prophet secretary problem, improving upon the best known result of Azar et al. (in: Proceedings of the ACM conference on economics and computation, EC, 2018), and even that of Beyhaghi et al. (Improved approximations for posted price and second price mechanisms. CoRR arXiv:1807.03435 , 2018) that works in the case in which the gambler can select the order of the samples. The crux of the result is a very precise analysis of the underlying stopping time distribution for the gambler’s strategy that is inspired by the theory of Schur-convex functions. We further prove that our family of blind strategies cannot lead to a constant better than 0.675. Finally we prove that no algorithm for the gambler can achieve a constant better than √(3)-1 ≈ 0.732 , which also improves upon a recent result of Azar et al. (in: Proceedings of the ACM conference on economics and computation, EC, 2018). This implies that the upper bound on what the gambler can get in the prophet secretary problem is strictly lower than what she can get in the i.i.d. case. This constitutes the first separation between the prophet secretary problem and the i.i.d. prophet inequality.