Inverted Lobes Have Satisfactory Functions Compared With Noninverted Lobes in Lung Transplantation.

Background. To overcome the problem of small-for-size grafts in standard living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), we developed inverted LDLLT, in which a right lower lobe from 1 donor is implanted as a right graft and another right lower lobe from another donor is implanted as a left graft. We retrospectively analyzed the functions of inverted grafts vs noninverted grafts. Methods. Between 2008 and 2015, 64 LDLLTs were performed. Included were 35 LDLLTs whose recipients were adults and monitored for more than 6 months without developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Among them, 65 implanted lobes were eligible for this analysis. There were 31 right lower lobes implanted as right grafts (right-to-right group), 7 right lower lobes as inverted left grafts (right-to-left group), and 27 left lower lobes as left grafts (left-to-left group). We evaluated the graft forced vital capacity (G-FVC) and graft volume of the 65 lobes before and 6 months after LDLLT and compared them among the three groups. Results. Preoperatively, G-FVC in the right-to-left group (1,050 mL) was comparable to that in the right-to-right group (1,177 mL) and better than that in the left-to-left group (791 mL, p < 0.01). Six months after LDLLT, G-FVC in the right-to-left group (1,015 mL) remained comparable to that in the right-to-right group (1,001 mL) and better than that in the left-to-left group (713 mL, p = 0.047). The ratio of graft volume 6 months after LDLLT to the preoperative value was comparable. Conclusions. The functions of inverted grafts in inverted LDLLTs were satisfactory compared with those of noninverted grafts. (c) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons