A quantitative analysis of researcher citation personal display considering disciplinary differences and influence factors

Scientometrics(2017)

引用 3|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Personal websites are a good place not only for the scientists to show a wealth of content, but also for researchers to excavate some useful information related to quantitative evaluation. Based on researchers’ personal websites this study aims to investigate the degree of citation personal display (CPD) in three major disciplines (chemistry, mathematics, and physics), as well as disciplinary differences in CPD. This paper also studies the factors which have influences on CPD by using binary logistic regression. The datasets studied consisted of 5771 researchers in 39 U.S. universities. Results show that CPD varies significantly by discipline, with chemistry researchers having the highest CPD (15.3%), followed by physics researchers (12.7%), and mathematics researchers (7.1%). The binary logistic models indicate that total citations, h -index, and citations per publication have significantly positive effects on CPD in chemistry; for mathematics, total citations and h -index do; and for physics, only total citations does ( p < .05). The significantly positive influence of publication counts occurs in chemistry and mathematics, and significantly negative influences of scientific age and academic rank only appear in chemistry ( p < .05).
更多
查看译文
关键词
Personal website,Citation personal display,Bibliometric indicators,Citation analysis,Binary logistic regression,Disciplinary differences,Influence factors
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要