Corrigendum to "Craniofacial implants at a single centre 2005-2015: retrospective review of 451 implants" [Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;55:242-5].

The authors regret an incorrect Fig. 1 published in the above mentioned paper. Please find correct figure below: The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Craniofacial implants at a single centre 2005-2015: retrospective review of 451 implantsBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 55Issue 3PreviewCraniofacial endosseous implants are regularly used to support prostheses in the rehabilitation of complex defects, but reported success rates vary. To review our own clinical practice over 10 years, and particularly to examine the impact of radiotherapy and the timing of placement on the survival of implants, we retrospectively audited the records for all patients who had endosseous implants for prosthetic rehabilitation in our unit between 2005 and 2015. We reviewed 167 records, which gave 451 implants, of which, 222 (49%) were auricular, 98 (22%) nasal, and 131 (29%) orbital. Full-Text PDF