Comparison of the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and a vacuum erectile device on penile erectile dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial.

MEDICINE(2017)

引用 5|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Background:This randomized clinical trial (October 2012-December 2013) compared extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and a vacuum erectile device (VED) for management of erectile dysfunction (ED).Methods:Consecutive Chinese patients (20-55 years) with ED, abnormal nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR), and international index of erectile function-5 items (IIEF-5) score <22 were randomized to receive ESWT or VED (twice weekly, 4 weeks). Primary outcomes were treatment efficacy and success rate 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Secondary outcomes included changes in IIEF-5 score, sex encounter profile (SEP) score, erection hardness score (EHS) and NPTR assessments 4 weeks post-therapy. All enrolled patients (n=30 per group) completed the study. At baseline, age, IIEF-5 score, SEP score, EHS, and NPTR assessments were similar between groups.Results:Four weeks post-therapy, IIEF-5 score increased in the ESWT (15.033.00 vs. 11.60 +/- 2.28) and VED (15.10 +/- 3.06 vs. 11.53 +/- 2.27) groups, as did SEP score, EHS, and NPTR measures (all P<.05). Efficacy in the ESWT and VED groups was excellent in 10% and 13.3%, respectively, and moderate in 63.3% and 53.3%, respectively. Treatment success rate in the ESWT and VED groups was 73.3% and 67.7%, respectively.Conclusion:VED use and ESWT have comparable efficacies in the treatment of ED in Chinese patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
efficacy,erectile dysfunction,extracorporeal shock wave therapy,vacuum erectile device
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要