An Experimental Evaluation of SimRank-based Similarity Search Algorithms.

Given a graph, SimRank is one of the most popular measures of the similarity between two vertices. We focus on efficiently calculating SimRank, which has been studied intensively over the last decade. This has led to many algorithms that efficiently calculate or approximate SimRank being proposed by researchers. Despite these abundant research efforts, there is no systematic comparison of these algorithms. In this paper, we conduct a study to compare these algorithms to understand their pros and cons. We first introduce a taxonomy for different algorithms that calculate SimRank and classify each algorithm into one of the following three classes, namely, iterative-, non-iterative-, and random walk-based method. We implement ten algorithms published from 2002 to 2015, and compare them using synthetic and real-world graphs. To ensure the fairness of our study, our implementations use the same data structure and execution framework, and we try our best to optimize each of these algorithms. Our study reveals that none of these algorithms dominates the others: algorithms based on iterative method often have higher accuracy while algorithms based on random walk can be more scalable. One noniterative algorithm has good effectiveness and efficiency on graphs with medium size. Thus, depending on the requirements of different applications, the optimal choice of algorithms differs. This paper provides an empirical guideline for making such choices.