Towards Non-Black-Box Separations of Public Key Encryption and One Way Function.
IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive(2016)
摘要
Separating public key encryption from one way functions is one of the fundamental goals of complexity-based cryptography. Beginning with the seminal work of Impagliazzo and Rudich STOC, 1989, a sequence of works have ruled out certain classes of reductions from public key encryption PKE--or even key agreement--to one way function. Unfortunately, known results--so called black-box separations--do not apply to settings where the construction and/or reduction are allowed to directly access the code, or circuit, of the one way function. In this work, we present a meaningful, non-black-box separation between public key encryption PKE and one way function. Specifically, we introduce the notion of $$\\mathsf {BBN}^-$$BBN- reductions similar to the $$\\mathsf {BBN}$$BBNp reductions of Baecher et al. ASIACRYPT, 2013, in which the construction E accesses the underlying primitive in a black-box way, but wherein the universal reduction $${{\\mathbb R}}$$R receives the efficient code/circuit of the underlying primitive as input and is allowed oracle access to the adversary $$\\mathsf {Adv}$$Adv. We additionally require that the functions describing the number of oracle queries made to $$\\mathsf {Adv}$$Adv, and the success probability of $${{\\mathbb R}}$$R are independent of the run-time/circuit size of the underlying primitive. We prove that there is no non-adaptive, $$\\mathsf {BBN}^-$$BBN-reduction from PKE to one way function, under the assumption that certain types of strong one way functions exist. Specifically, we assume that there exists a regular one way function f such that there is no Arthur-Merlin protocol proving that $$z \\notin \\mathsf {Range}f$$z﾿Rangef, where soundness holds with high probability over \"no instances,\" $$y \\sim fU_n$$y~fUn, and Arthur may receive polynomial-sized, non-uniform advice. This assumption is related to the average-case analogue of the widely believed assumption $$\\mathsf {coNP}\\not \\subseteq \\mathbf {NP}/{\\mathrm{poly}}$$coNP﾿NP/poly.
更多查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要