Continuous infusion vs intermittent vancomycin in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients

PURPOSE:Target plasma level achievement has remained a challenge in neurosurgical intensive care unit patients receiving intravenous vancomycin. We evaluated continuous infusion (CI) and intermittent vancomycin dosing strategies in these patients. METHODS:This retrospective cohort compared CI vancomycin (target random levels, 20-30 mg/L) to intermittent vancomycin (target troughs, 15-20 mg/L) in regards to achievement of target plasma levels, nephrotoxicity, pharmacodynamic target attainment, and cost savings in 130 patients. RESULTS:Continuous infusion resulted in greater achievement of goal plasma concentrations at the first steady-state level (40 vs 21.5%, P = .02), more rapid achievement of goal plasma concentrations (2.04 vs 3.76 days, P < .0001), and increased time within therapeutic range (55% vs 34%, P < .0001) but no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (15.4% vs 21.5%, P = .5). Continuous infusion improved pharmacodynamic target attainment (92.3% vs 30.8%, P < .0001) and also reduced levels drawn (3.8 vs 5.7, P = .0007), dose adjustments (1.4 vs 2.4, P = .0006), days of therapy (10.4 vs 14.1, P = .01), and mean total daily dose requirements (33 vs 35.7 mg/kg, P < .0001) per patient. CONCLUSIONS:Continuous infusion appears beneficial for improving attainment of target plasma concentrations, pharmacodynamic goals, and financial burden, without increasing risk of acute kidney injury.