Why Do Patients with Stroke Not Receive the Recommended Amount of Active Therapy (react)? Study Protocol for a Multisite Case Study Investigation.
BMJ OPEN(2015)
Bradford Inst Hlth Res
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Increased frequency and intensity of inpatient therapy contributes to improved outcomes for stroke survivors. Differences exist in the amount of therapy provided internationally. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland it is recommended that a minimum of 45 min of each active therapy should be provided at least 5 days a week provided the therapy is appropriate and that the patient can tolerate this. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (2014) data demonstrate this standard is not being achieved for most patients. No research been undertaken to explore how therapists in England manage their practice to meet time-specific therapy recommendations. The ReAcT study aims to develop an in-depth understanding of stroke therapy provision, including how the guideline of 45 min a day of each relevant therapy, is interpreted and implemented by therapists, and how it is experienced by stroke-survivors and their families. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:A multisite ethnographic case study design in a minimum of six stroke units will include modified process mapping, observations of service organisation, therapy delivery and documentary analysis. Semistructured interviews with therapists and service managers (n=90), and with patients and informal carers (n=60 pairs) will be conducted. Data will be analysed using the Framework approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study received a favourable ethical opinion via the National Research Ethics Service (reference number: 14/NW/0266). Participants will provide written informed consent or, where stroke-survivors lack capacity, a consultee declaration will be sought. ReAcT is designed to generate insights into the organisational, professional, social, practical and patient-related factors acting as facilitators or barriers to providing the recommended amount of therapy. Provisional recommendations will be debated in consensus meetings with stakeholders who have not participated in ReAcT case studies or interviews. Final recommendations will be disseminated to therapists, service managers, clinical guideline developers and policymakers and stroke-survivors and informal carers.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
Infarction Treatment,Constraint-Induced Therapy,Patient Outcomes
PDF
View via Publisher
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Related Papers
A Mechanism for Elbow Exoskeleton for Customised Training.
International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2017
被引用9
CLINICAL REHABILITATION 2018
被引用66
Excessive Sedentary Time During In-Patient Stroke Rehabilitation
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION 2018
被引用50
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 2018
被引用10
Revisiting Poststroke Upper Limb Stratification: Resilience in a Larger Cohort.
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR 2021
被引用5
A Method of Using Statistical Features Extraction and GA-SVM for EEG Classification
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks 2022
被引用0
Design Methodology of Portable Upper Limb Exoskeletons for People with Strokes
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE 2023
被引用11
BMC Health Services Research 2023
被引用2
Comparative Study of Actuation Systems for Portable Upper Limb Exoskeletons.
Medical Engineering & Physics 2018
被引用44
BMC Health Services Research 2024
被引用1
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn
Chat Paper
去 AI 文献库 对话