Protecting the Rights of Defendants in Cases Where the Question of Competency Has Been Raised

Matthew Chang,Hal S Wortzel,Richard Martinez

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law（2013）

引用 23|浏览2

暂无评分

摘要

In Curtis v. State , 948 N.E.2d 1143 (Ind. 2011), the Supreme Court of Indiana clarified that a speedy-trial claim under Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C) and a speedy-trial claim under the federal or state constitution must be asserted separately and distinctly, and that delays not attributable to the

查看译文

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要