Evaluation of prophylactic precautions after exposure to biological materials]

Objectives: Study of transmission rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV). hepatitis C virus (HCV). and human immunode.ficiency virus (HIV) and effect of HBV vaccination after pare.nteral exposure to biological materials. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study or 879 individuals (419 health care professionals and 460 persons from the general population) after blood and body fluid exposure examined at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases in Ostrava from 1999 to 2013. HBsAg. anti-HBs, anti-HBc. anti-HCV. anti-HIV, bilirubin. and ALT were tested in exposed patients and known sources at the baseline and. except anti-HBc. after 3, 6, and 12 months. Susceptible persons were vaccinated against HBV and screened for anti-HBs after 1-2 months. Antiretroviral prophylaxis was provided if reasonable. Results: At the baseline. 42 exposed persons were HBV positive. six were HCV 'positive. and none was HIV p0- tive. During the follow-up, no new HB5i4g positivity as detected in exposed individuals. although 25 of 837 susceptible persons were exposed to HBsAg-positive sources. After vaccination, protective anti -HBs were detected in 707(84.7%) of 837 susceptible persons and in 709(97.8%) of 725 persons with known post-vaccination response. Fifty-six of 873 persons had been exposed to HCV-positive sources and HCV transmission was shown in three (two health care professionals) of them. No HIV transmission was observed. although 11 of 879 individuals had been exposed to HIV-positive sources, with antiretroviral prophylaxis provided to nine or them. Conclusions: Contemporary post-exposure prophylactic precautions in the Czech Republic can be considered as adequate for the prevention of HBV and HIV, but health care professionals in particular are at risk of HCV transmission.