Retrograde transileal conduit stent placement for obstructed uropathy--success of primary and exchange stent placement.

PURPOSE:To assess the safety, success, and complications associated with retrograde ureteric stent insertion via the ileal conduit. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The study population comprised 35 consecutive patients (17 men and 18 women; mean age, 55 y; age range, 40-75 y) requiring primary (20 stents) and exchange (70 stents) retrograde ureteric stent insertion via the ileal conduit over a 3-year period. Patient demographic data, procedural and technical data, and clinical follow-up data were collected. RESULTS:Technical success was 90% (18 of 20) for primary stent placement and 100% (70 of 70) for stent exchange. There were two immediate complications (< 24 h) of sepsis and ureteric injury and one early complication (> 25 h but < 30 d) of sepsis requiring observation and medical management. Difficult procedures (defined as a fluoroscopy screening time > 31 min) and technical failures were found to be associated with encrusted stents visualized on prior computed tomography (P = .012), increased length of ileal conduit (> 20 cm) (P = .023), and ileal conduit kink (< 90 degrees) (P = .032). Only the occurrence of encrusted stents visualized on prior computed tomography (P = .022) was associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS:Retrograde placement of ureteric stents via the ileal conduit is safe and effective. Retrograde stent placement should be considered the treatment option of choice for a first-time occurrence of obstructive uropathy at the ureteroileal anastomosis.