Similar five-year outcome with paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents.

Objective. Millions of patients were treated with the sirolimus-eluting Cypher (TM) and the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus (TM) coronary stents with potential late-occurring increase in event rates. Therefore, the long-term outcome follow-up is of major clinical interest. Design. In total, 2.098 unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI, stable or unstable angina pectoris were randomized to receive Cypher (TM) (n = 1.065) or Taxus (TM) (n = 1.033) stents and were followed for 5 years. Results. The primary end-point; the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization (major adverse cardiac event, MACE), occurred in 467 patients (22.3%); Cypher (TM) n = 222 (20.8%), Taxus (TM) n = 245 (23.7%), ns. Definite and probable stent thrombosis occurred in 107 patients (5.1%); Cypher (TM) n = 51 (4.8%), Taxus (TM) n = 56 (5.4%), ns. No statistically significant differences were found in the elements of the primary end-point or in other secondary end-points between the two stent groups. After one year, the annual rates of stent thrombosis and MACE remained constant. Conclusions. During 5-year follow-up, the Cypher (TM) and the Taxus (TM) coronary stents had similar clinical outcome with no signs of increasing rates of adverse events over time.