Single-incision Mini-slings Versus Retropubic Tension-free Vaginal Tapes: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology(2014)

引用 11|浏览9
暂无评分
摘要
Study Objective To compare single-incision mini-slings (SIMSs) and retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (r-TVT) in terms of the long-term efficacy and safety for the treatment of female stress (SUI) or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Design Prospective multicenter cohort trial (registration number NCT00751088) (Canadian Task Force II). Settings Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Italy. Patients Two hundred-forty women with SUI/MUI. Interventions SIMS or r-TVT. Measurements and Main Results The operative time and the use of analgesic tablets were significantly (p < .001) higher and lower, respectively, in the r-TVT group versus the SIMS group. After 24 months of follow-up, no difference between the study arms was observed in terms of the complication rate (30/120 [25%] vs 19/120 [15.8%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–2.65; p = .083), whereas the subjective cure rate was significantly lower in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (57/103 [55.3%] vs 89/106 [84.0%] for the r-TVT and SIMS arms, respectively; relative risk = 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.80]; p < .001). The proportion of retreated patients for SUI/MUI was significantly higher in the SIMS arm than in the r-TVT arm (37/103 [34.9%] vs 12/106 [11.3%] for SIMS and r-TVT arm, respectively; p < .001). Conclusion SIMS has no advantage in terms of safety over r-TVT and was found to be less effective than r-TVT. Thus, its use in the clinical practice should be questioned.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Clinical trial,Incontinence,Mini-slings,Single-incision,Sling,Surgery
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要