Trends, Indications And Outcomes Of Cardiac Implantable Device System Extraction: A Single Uk Centre Experience Over The Last Decade

Background: The rising number of device implantation has seen a parallel in the rising numbers of lead extraction. Herein we have analysed our experience in cardiac device and lead extraction in a single tertiary centre over the last decade. Method: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing lead extractions performed between 2001 and 2010. Procedural success and complications as defined by the Heart Rhythm Society policy. Results: A total of 745 leads were extracted with a procedural success of 98.9% [382 cases; partial success in 6.9% (26) cases] and failure in 1.1% (4). Major complication rate was 1% (four cases) and minor complication rate was 3.6%. By both univariate and multivariate analysis only duration of lead implantation was an indicator for success (p < 0.0001). The mean implantation time for failed lead extraction was 203 +/- 64 months compared with 71.8 +/- 16.5 months in the successful cohort (p < 0.0001). Laser-assisted extraction was required in 176 cases. With regard to extraction indication, lead malfunction/recall showed a significant increase during the study period (p = 0.03). On time trend analysis the rise in coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction over time was significant. (p = 0.02) Despite a trend for increased laser use over time this did not achieve statistical significance, p = 0.06. Conclusions: A decade's experience of percutaneous lead extraction suggests that a high procedural success rate with a low complication rate is achieved in a high-volume centre. During this time, an increase in both defibrillator and CS lead explantation and a rising trend in laser assistance with almost 50% of cases needing laser usage were observed.