Successful Use Of Intra-Arrest Thrombolysis For Electrical Storm Due To Acute Myocardial Infarction? (Vol 33, 990.E5, 2015)

Karina Reyner,Alan C. Heffner,J. Lee Garvey, Sama Ghali,Vivek S. Tayal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE(2017)

引用 4|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Acute vascular thrombotic disease, including acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, accounts for 70% of sudden outpatient cardiac arrest. The role of intra-arrest thrombolytic administration aimed at reversing the underlying cause of cardiac arrest remains an area of debate with recent guidelines advising against routine use. We present a case of prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm in a patient who demonstrated intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic markers confirming acute myocardial infarction. Return of spontaneous circulation was rapidly achieved after rescue intra-arrest bolus thrombolysis.Highlights of this case are discussed in the context of the current evidence for thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest with specific attention to the issue of patient selection.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要