Seguridad y viabilidad del retorno precoz de pacientes transferidos para angioplastia primaria a sus centros de origen

Revista Española de Cardiología(2009)

引用 32|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction and objectives. At present, little information is available on returning patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to their originating centers after transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the early return of these patients to their originating centers. Methods. The cohort study involved 200 consecutive STEMI patients (age 62 13 years, 83% male) who were returned to their originating centers after PPCI. They were compared with a group of 297 patients with similar characteristics from our healthcare catchment area. The length of stay in the intervention hospital and major adverse cardiovascular events occurring within 30 days were recorded. Results. The median length of stay in the intervention hospital was 8 hours. No adverse events occurred during transport in the group who returned to their originating centers. At 30-day follow-up, no significant difference was observed between patients who returned and the control group in either mortality (1.0% vs. 3.7%; P=.064), readmission (5.0% vs. 4.5%; P=.657), ischemic complications (2.5% vs. 2.0%; P=.721), re-catheterization (5.0% vs. 2.5%; P=.112), stroke (11 % vs. 1%; P=.936) or the composite end-point (11 % vs. 9.2%; P=.540). Multivariate analysis showed that returning patients after PPCI was not associated with a significantly greater number of major adverse cardiovascular events (odds ratio=1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-2.80). Conclusions. The early return of patients with low-risk STEMI to their originating centers after PPCI was safe and feasible.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Infarto de miocardio,Angioplastia primaria,Retorno precoz,Red de angioplastia
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要