Identification of Limited English Proficient Patients in Clinical Care

Background Standardized means to identify patients likely to benefit from language assistance are needed. Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the U.S. Census English proficiency question (Census-LEP) in predicting patients’ ability to communicate effectively in English. Design We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the Census-LEP alone or in combination with a question on preferred language for medical care for predicting patient-reported ability to discuss symptoms and understand physician recommendations in English. Participants Three hundred and two patients > 18 who spoke Spanish and/or English recruited from a cardiology clinic and an inpatient general medical-surgical ward in 2004–2005. Results One hundred ninety-eight (66%) participants reported speaking English less than “very well” and 166 (55%) less than “well”; 157 (52%) preferred receiving their medical care in Spanish. Overall, 135 (45%) were able to discuss symptoms and 143 (48%) to understand physician recommendations in English. The Census-LEP with a high-threshold (less than “very well”) had the highest sensitivity for predicting effective communication (100% Discuss; 98.7% Understand), but the lowest specificity (72.6% Discuss; 67.1% Understand). The composite measure of Census-LEP and preferred language for medical care provided a significant increase in specificity (91.9% Discuss; 83.9% Understand), with only a marginal decrease in sensitivity (99.4% Discuss; 96.7% Understand). Conclusions Using the Census-LEP item with a high-threshold of less than “very well” as a screening question, followed by a language preference for medical care question, is recommended for inclusive and accurate identification of patients likely to benefit from language assistance. (246 words)