Logical Omniscience at the Laboratory

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics(2016)

引用 8|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
•We experimentally measure how many steps of counterfactual reasoning humans can do.•In order to separate cognitive ability from other behavioural influence factors in games we use a novel computerized version of the Dirty Faces Game.•We find that on average our subjects can perform two to three steps of iterative reasoning.•This shows that subjects are better at iterative reasoning than suggested by studies that do not control for subjects’ beliefs about the rationality of others or social preferences.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Iterative reasoning,Depth of reasoning,Logical omniscience,Rationality,Experiments,Other-regarding preferences
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要