Does metal backing improve fixation of tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty?

In a prospective, randomized study, patients with medial gonarthrosis stage I to III according to Ahlbäck were allocated to a unicondylar knee arthroplasty (Miller-Galante, Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, IN) with an all-polyethylene tibial component or metal-backed tibial component of the same design. The purpose of the study was to evaluate if metal backing enhanced tibial component fixation. A total of 45 knees (42 patients; 23 metal-backed components and 22 all-polyethylene components) were examined. We used radiostereometric analysis to measure micromotion of the tibial component over a period of 2 years after surgery. Hospital for Special Surgery score was used for clinical evaluation. We found no statistically significant differences in clinical results or migration of the tibial component over a 2-year follow-up period. These findings do not support better fixation of metal-backed tibial components. Because of these findings, we advocate all-polyethylene tibial components in unicondylar knee arthroplasties because of optimal biomechanical strength at a given height of tibial component, avoiding potential problems of modularity and minimizing the amount of interfaces, at a lower cost.