Temporary Inferior Vena Cava Filters: In Vitro Comparison with Permanent IVC Filters

PURPOSE: An in vitro comparison of clot-trapping abilities of permanent and temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A flow model was used to simulate the IVC. Two permanent IVC filters, the titanium Greenfield and LG-Medical (LGM), were compared with two temporary filters, the Filcard International and Gunther. Clot sizes used were 2.5 x 2.5 mm, 2.5 x 5 mm, 5 x 5 mm, 5 x 10 mm, and 5 x 20 mm. Individual clots were presented to the filters with the simulated IVC in a horizontal or vertical orientation. Clot-trapping dynamics and pressure gradient changes during the injection of multiple, sequential clots were also examined. RESULTS: As clot size diminished, all filters trapped fewer clots; however, the temporary filters trapped more small clots than the permanent filters. Very little difference was observed in clot-trapping abilities among the filters for clots of 5 x 10 mm or greater. In the horizontal orientation, the permanent filters trapped 38% of all clots delivered, while the temporary filters trapped 73%, chi(2) = 24.8 (P < .001). In the vertical orientation, the overall clot-trapping abilities of the filters improved, with the permanent filters trapping 73% of all clots delivered, while the temporary filters trapped 95%, chi(2) = 18 (P < .001). During trapping of multiple clots, the temporary filters allowed fewer clots to pass. CONCLUSION: The temporary filters performed better than the permanent filters in both individual clot-trapping orientations. During multiple clot-trapping experiments, fewer clots were allowed to pass by the temporary filters. The temporary filters demonstrated the ability to capture clots both inside and outside the wire struts.