A cost-utility analysis comparing intensive chemotherapy alone to intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue in newly diagnosed patients with stage II/III multiple myeloma

European Journal of Cancer(2004)

引用 54|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
A prospective randomised phase III study in patients ⩽65 years old with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM), intensive chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell rescue was compared with intensive chemotherapy alone. This economic evaluation was based on detailed data from patient charts and hospital information systems. In the intention-to-treat analysis, mean total treatment and follow-up costs of the myeloablative treatment arm were €81,643 compared to €68,802 for the chemotherapy arm (P=0.09). Costs per quality-adjusted life year were €51,357 versus €37,328. In the clinical study, no significant differences were found in overall survival after a median follow-up of 33 months from randomisation. Intensive chemotherapy is regarded as standard therapy for younger patients with previously untreated MM. Cost-effectiveness of myeloma therapy after 3 years of follow up seems not to be favoured by myeloablative treatment with autologous stem-cell rescue.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Costs and cost analysis,Multiple myeloma,Intensive chemotherapy,Melphalan,Myeloablative therapy,Transplantation, autologous,Stem-cell rescue,Interferon
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要