Search Engine Overlaps: Do they agree or disagree?

ICSE: International Conference on Software Engineering(2007)

引用 62|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Context: Secondary studies, such as systematic literature reviews and mapping studies, are an essential element of the evidence-based paradigm. A critical part of the review process is the identification of all relevant research. As such, any researcher intending to conduct a secondary review should be aware of the strengths and weakness of the search engines available. Objectives: Analyse the overlap between search engine results for software engineering studies. Methods: Three independent studies were conducted to evaluate the overlap between multiple search engines for different search areas. Results: The findings indicate that very little overlap was found between the search engines. Conclusions of the study: To complete a systematic review, researchers must use multiple search terms and search engines. The lack of overlap might also be caused by inconsistent keyword selection amongst authors.
更多
查看译文
关键词
search engine overlaps,systematic literature review,multiple search term,multiple search engine,search engine,secondary review,search engine result,different search area,secondary study,systematic review,review process,software design,search engines,databases,computer science,protocols,data analysis,mathematics,publishing,software engineering
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要