基本信息
浏览量:89
职业迁徙
个人简介
Research Interests
Cortical neural responses are hugely variable, redundant, and robust. Does the brain relies on huge numbers of unreliable units to compensate for such "noise"? Are spikes random samples from an underlying firing rate? Our recent work, combining theory and analysis of multi-unit recordings in retina and cortex, suggests quite the contrary. Despite apparences, biological neural networks are exquisitely tuned to represent relevant stimuli as reliably and efficiently as possible, spike after spike. The signature of this efficiency is the balance between excitation and inhibition maintained at all levels of cortical neural processing. This introduces an entirely new theoretical and experimental framework to explore neural coding, plasticity and adaptation.
Recent years have seen the growing use of models formalizing sensory perception, motor control or behavioral strategies as probabilistic inference tasks. Excitable neural structures face similar problems than behaving organisms: they receive noisy and ambiguous inputs, must accumulate evidence over time, combine unreliable cues, and compete with other neurons representing alternative interpretations of the sensory input. We apply such normative models, particularly Bayesian networks, in order to further our understanding of the function and dynamics of biological neural networks.
The E/I balance is equally important at a much larger scale, when we consider how different brain areas communicate. Cognition, motor action and decision making are inherently hierarchical, and this hierarchy is reflected in the brain organisation. We consider how E/I balance in a hierachical neural networks would affect perception, motor control and decision making at the macroscopic, behavioral scale. We find that it can cause circular inference, where prior beliefs are "mixed-up" and mistaken as sensory information, and vice-versa. We hypothesize that such a dis-regulation could be involved in the formation of hallucinations and delusions. We are currently testing this hypothesis by performing behavioral experiments in schizophenic patients and controls.
Cortical neural responses are hugely variable, redundant, and robust. Does the brain relies on huge numbers of unreliable units to compensate for such "noise"? Are spikes random samples from an underlying firing rate? Our recent work, combining theory and analysis of multi-unit recordings in retina and cortex, suggests quite the contrary. Despite apparences, biological neural networks are exquisitely tuned to represent relevant stimuli as reliably and efficiently as possible, spike after spike. The signature of this efficiency is the balance between excitation and inhibition maintained at all levels of cortical neural processing. This introduces an entirely new theoretical and experimental framework to explore neural coding, plasticity and adaptation.
Recent years have seen the growing use of models formalizing sensory perception, motor control or behavioral strategies as probabilistic inference tasks. Excitable neural structures face similar problems than behaving organisms: they receive noisy and ambiguous inputs, must accumulate evidence over time, combine unreliable cues, and compete with other neurons representing alternative interpretations of the sensory input. We apply such normative models, particularly Bayesian networks, in order to further our understanding of the function and dynamics of biological neural networks.
The E/I balance is equally important at a much larger scale, when we consider how different brain areas communicate. Cognition, motor action and decision making are inherently hierarchical, and this hierarchy is reflected in the brain organisation. We consider how E/I balance in a hierachical neural networks would affect perception, motor control and decision making at the macroscopic, behavioral scale. We find that it can cause circular inference, where prior beliefs are "mixed-up" and mistaken as sensory information, and vice-versa. We hypothesize that such a dis-regulation could be involved in the formation of hallucinations and delusions. We are currently testing this hypothesis by performing behavioral experiments in schizophenic patients and controls.
研究兴趣
论文共 123 篇作者统计合作学者相似作者
按年份排序按引用量排序主题筛选期刊级别筛选合作者筛选合作机构筛选
时间
引用量
主题
期刊级别
合作者
合作机构
Journal of Computational Social Science (2024): 1-23
Salomé Leclercq,Sébastien Szaffarczyk,Pantelis Leptourgos, Pierre Yger, Alexandra Fakhri,Marielle Wathelet,Vincent Bouttier,Sophie Denève,Renaud Jardri
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews (2022): 104593-104593
biorxiv(2021)
bioRxivno. 1 (2021): 1417-1417
加载更多
作者统计
合作学者
合作机构
D-Core
- 合作者
- 学生
- 导师
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn